Romans
1:17“ For in it the righteousness
of God is revealed from faith to faith; as it is written, "The
just shall live by faith."
Galatians
3:11 “But that no one is justified
by the law in the sight of God is evident, for "the just shall
live by faith."
Hebrews
10:38 “Now the just shall live by faith;
But if anyone draws back, My soul has no pleasure in him."
“Articles
of Faith"
An
Orderly Account
Of
The Greatest Story Ever Told
(A
Study in Luke)
Chapter
10:25-37:
We
now traverse from the sending out of the seventy to a challenge that brings
about one the more memorable parables of the Lord.
Text
#1:
Luke
10:25-28 “And behold, a certain
lawyer stood up and tested Him, saying, “Teacher, what shall I do to inherit
eternal life?”
26 He said to him, “What is written
in the law? What is your reading of it? ”
27 So he answered and said, “ ‘You
shall love the LORD your God with all your heart, with all your soul,
with all your strength, and with all your mind,' and ‘your neighbor
as yourself.' ”
28 And He said to him, “You have answered
rightly; do this and you will live.”
See
also: Matthew 22:34-40; Mark
12:28-34.
Lawyer:
Many have speculated that a scribe
was one that copied the law, while a lawyer expounded the oral law or
traditions of the elders. However, based on the use of the word and its
root meaning in translation, there is no difference between the translated
terms of lawyer or scribe.
These
were those who expounded and copied the Law and at the time of Jesus were
equally engaged in the traditions associated orally with the law (Matthew
15:9).
The
scribes were associated closely with the sect of the Pharisees and in
many cases saw the Lord in the same light (threat) and felt His rebukes
directed at their perversion of the Old Law.
This
lawyer stood up to draw attention to him and thus give emphasis to the
question and the answer he would receive.
Tested
Him: The scribes already saw Jesus
as a Sabbath breaker and One who despised the traditions of the fathers,
thus he probably thought Jesus would introduce something new or against
their traditions. Imagine his surprise when he was referred to resource
the Law of Moses. There are similarities in this account to that of Matthew
and Mark's; however, there are also some stark contrasts. For example;
here Jesus asks the scribe for the answer, while in the other accounts
He gives the answer. The tests of the scribes and Pharisees were numerous
and it should not surprise us to have more than one account with unique
similarities, yet separate accounts.
He
Answered: Having made himself conspicuous
by standing up, the lawyer had to give the best answer he knew or damage
his own reputation for knowledge. Therefore he gives two laws of the Old
Covenant that encompass and comprise all the rest, if practiced – Deuteronomy
6:4-5; Leviticus
19:18.
In
Matthew 22:40,
the Lord would state that on these two commandments hung all the law and
the Prophets. In Mark
12:31, Jesus would state that there
were no greater commandments than these. Thus the lawyer answered correctly!
Do
This: This statement by the Lord
was something that the scribe did not expect. With him the law was something
to speculate and theorize about. When Jesus told him to “do”,
this was startling for him. He had hoped by his question to expose Jesus
as one who set aside the law and the traditions of the fathers. Instead,
he finds that the Lord has caused him to not just speculate but answer
his own question with an answer he must absolutely obey.
Text
#2:
Luke
10:29
“But he, wanting to justify
himself, said to Jesus, “And who is my neighbor?”
Who
is My Neighbor? He thought he could
justify his conduct and practice up to this point, if permitted to define
the word neighbor. He asked his question in the expectation of securing
such a definition of the word as to maintain his public standing and ease
his own conscience.
Text
#3:
Luke
10:30-35 “Then Jesus answered
and said: “A certain man went down from Jerusalem to Jericho,
and fell among thieves, who stripped him of his clothing, wounded him,
and departed, leaving him half dead. 31
Now by chance a certain priest came down that road. And when he
saw him, he passed by on the other side. 32
Likewise a Levite, when he arrived at the place, came and looked,
and passed by on the other side. 33
But a certain Samaritan, as he journeyed, came where he was. And
when he saw him, he had compassion. 34
So he went to him and bandaged his wounds, pouring on
oil and wine; and he set him on his own animal, brought him to an inn,
and took care of him. 35 On
the next day, when he departed, he took out two denarii, gave them
to the innkeeper, and said to him, ‘Take care of him; and whatever
more you spend, when I come again, I will repay you.'
The
Road: Jesus answers the scribe through
the illustration of a parable. He starts by stating that a “certain
man”. Parables were for the purpose of casting beside, to reveal
a spiritual message through the use of common illustrations. The specifics
of whom this man is or even if he was someone specific was unnecessary
for the purpose of the illustration and we know that his nationality was
Jewish or the Lord would have stated otherwise.
The
road from Jerusalem
to Jericho is
approximately 18 miles
long and descends about 3500 ft .
in elevation; about 2 miles
from Jerusalem
the road passes through the village
of Bethany , but
for the remainder it passes through desolate mountains and ravines. In
addition, about half way between Jerusalem
and Jericho
there was an inn. This road was noted for robberies as it was easy for
bandits to hide in ambush to attack travelers. The road developed the
name, “bloody way” for this very reason.
Priest:
There was a large settlement in Jericho
for priests, so it was not a stretch to see
them travel this road often. Priests were those who prepared and offered
acceptable sacrifices on behalf of the people.
Levite:
These were those who were the temple
ministers, as the tribe of Levi had been set apart by God for His service.
Note:
In these first two, the scribe saw
his own life, for he saw in them a knowledge of the Law but a failure
to practice what they knew!
Samaritan:
The Samaritans were the hereditary
enemy of the Jews stemming back to the return from Babylonian captivity.
They were looked down upon by the Jews for their impure bloodlines and
failure to adhere to the traditions of the Jews. However, in the practice
of generosity and mercy, the Samaritan was more orthodox than either of
those who represented knowledge of the Old Law.
Denarii:
The value of a denarii was approximately
a day's wage.
Text
#4:
Luke
10:36-37 “So which of these
three do you think was neighbor to him who fell among the thieves?” 37
And he said, “He who showed mercy on him.” Then Jesus said to
him, “Go and do likewise.”
Which
of These Three: Rather than answering
the lawyer didactically “everyone is your neighbor” to his question; Jesus
had illustrated the practice of neighborliness in the good Samaritan.
His illustration in the parable was so strongly depicted that the lawyer
could not dismiss that it was found in an apostate race.
He
Who Showed Mercy: The lawyer could
not even bring himself to say the word Samaritan, showing how distasteful
it was to his lips. Jesus gave no countenance to racial prejudice even
though they did not receive Him just a few weeks before this.
Matthew
22:16 “And they sent to Him
their disciples with the Herodians, saying, “Teacher, we know that You
are true, and teach the way of God in truth; nor do You care about anyone,
for You do not regard the person of men.”
Mark
12:14 “When they had come,
they said to Him, “Teacher, we know that You are true, and care about
no one; for You do not regard the person of men, but teach the way of
God in truth. Is it lawful to pay taxes to Caesar, or not?”
Luke
20:21
“Then they asked Him, saying,
“Teacher, we know that You say and teach rightly, and You do not show
personal favoritism, but teach the way of God in truth:”
Jesus
would be acquitted of the fault of personal favoritism and likewise the
scriptures tell us that God is not a respecter of persons, note:
Acts
10:34
“Then Peter opened his
mouth and said: “In truth I perceive that God shows no partiality.”
Also
see: Romans 2:11; Galatians
2:6; Ephesians 6:9;
Colossians 3:25.
God's
word likewise demands that those who serve God through Christ Jesus must
serve without favoritism – James 2:1-13.
Go
and Do Likewise: In this final statement
of the Lord, the lesson is truly unveiled:
1)The laws and teachings of God are to be generously
received! Not debated and theorized
in order to abstain from practice or reception.
Matthew
5:43-44 “You have heard that
it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.'
44 But I say to you, love your
enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you, and
pray for those who spitefully use you and persecute you,”
2)The laws and teachings of God are to be embodied
in our lives ! Without partiality or
prejudice!
Matthew
7:21-23 “Not everyone who
says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,' shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who
does the will of My Father in heaven. 22
Many will say to Me in that day, ‘Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied
in Your name, cast out demons in Your name, and done many wonders in Your
name?' 23 And then I will declare
to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!”